Friday, 7 March 2025

The New Calvinists

"The first want of our day is a return to the old, simple and sharply-cut doctrines of our fathers" JC Ryle

Over the last 20 years there has been a shift in confessional reformed churches.  It is sometimes hard to put our finger on the issue.  The tone and tenor of churches have changed.  Fixed points, theological moorings, agreed points of theology all seem up for grabs.  Often it is subtle, but the message is clear: our forefathers were simple men but we are sophisticated and clever.  Culture, DNA and pragmatism have become king.  Adherence to historical confessional standards have become looser and more relaxed.  Ordination vows have become muddled.  Ministers and office bearers seem confused about what they have actually subscribed to.  The role of pastor has become a master of ceremonies rather than one ordained to lead worship and preach.  Worship must be bright and breezy and we must embrace the modern Christian music industrial complex.  The order, reverence, simplicity, structure and spirituality of reformed worship has been replaced with the latest worship music and practices.  We sing heresy long before we believe heresy and the signs are not encouraging.  


How are we to understand these changes?  Why has the 'cultural context' become so important?  At least part of the answer is the rise of a new kind of Calvinism.  As one theologian has said: 'With the New Calvinism, the dynamics change and Calvin becomes but a dim shadow.  Instead, there is a curious mixture of the Five Points, 16th century Anabaptism, 18th century revivalism, 20th century Pentecostalism, sophisticated  marketing, the latest technology, and high-decibel music.'  New Calvinism offers us a smorgasbord of worship and practice.  Contradictory positions, radically different worship strains and the profound and the superficial exist side by side.

Biblical truth, rediscovered in historical Calvinism, humbles man and exalts God.  It takes God's word seriously.  It covers the whole of life.  It is not loose and pragmatic but careful and systematic.  Abraham Kuyper said: 'The special trait of Calvinism is that it placed the believer before the face of God, not only in the Church, but also in his personal, family, social and political life.  The majesty of God, and the authority of God press upon the Calvinist in the whole of his human existence.'  I have republished some of my late fathers convictions on what we mean by Calvinism and what it means to be reformed.  So how are we to understand this New Calvinism?  

Below is an article by Rev Jeremy Walker who has written a more extensive book The New Calvinism Considered which we would highly recommend.  This article was written 10 years ago but it is very helpful for us to understand the context we find ourselves in today.  You can read more articles from Rev Walker on his blog.

If you are in evangelical and Reformed circles in the UK, it is almost certain that you, or someone you know, has been influenced by what has become known as the new Calvinism. The name is loosely applied to a group of individuals (think John Piper, Don Carson, the late Tim Keller, Mark Driscoll, Mark Dever, Al Mohler, Kevin DeYoung, Wayne Grudem) and networks, and networks of networks (think Together for the Gospel, The Gospel Coalition, Acts 29), who generally avow a more or less Calvinistic soteriology. However, their embrace of a more full-orbed Reformed principle, practice and polity is extremely varied. Although its fullest expressions remain largely American, it leaves a strong impress elsewhere. In the UK, its commitments and influences are more or less evident in such places and institutions as the Porterbrook Network, the Proclamation Trust, WEST, the FIEC, Affinity, Acts 29 Europe, and New Frontiers. The movement as a whole is evolving and nebulous, its boundary porous. Criticisms issued about definitions of the new Calvinism rarely take account of the fact that – almost by definition – it resists definition. It is more of a permeating flavour than a definite bloc.

Many assessments of the new Calvinism err in missing or dismissing the fact that the new Calvinism is a spectrum. The assessor either visits a certain conference or hears a certain preacher and declares the whole movement fundamentally sound and heading in a good direction, or hears some of the worst horror stories and imputes what is stated or implied to others without distinction. Each of us tends to be coloured by that to which we have been exposed. We must not presume that any one individual is a spokesman for all, however convenient that might be.

Taking into account the inherent difficulties of definition and assessment, any consideration should take account of two competing forces: the desire to exalt God and the tendency to exalt man. If we are honest, these are pressures with which every Christian and every church contends, and which each of us should assess in ourselves. However, in the case of the new Calvinism, these tensions are woven into the very being of the movement – they belong to its nature and cannot be separated from it.

At its best, the new Calvinism sets out to be and often succeeds in being a God-centred movement. It strikes many of the notes of historic and orthodox Christianity, though often with a distinctive flavour of our time and place. You might read books, or great sections of books, with which you almost entirely agree. You might hear a keynote sermon and offer your hearty and sincere, “Amen!” You might read blog posts and be ready to sigh in happy agreement. There will be much that deliberately sets out to exalt Christ and honour God; a determination to make much of God’s grace in Christ Jesus; a desire to make Christ known in all the earth; a general commitment to the preaching of the Word of God; a robust defence of manhood and womanhood as creatures made in God’s image but with their own distinctive roles in home, church and society; and, an eager and inventive embrace of new tools to propagate the gospel.

At its worst, the new Calvinism can seem or be thoroughly man-centred. Too many have adopted a carnal pragmatism and commercialism in seeking to advance the kingdom of God (often some man’s empire seems to be the more pressing concern). An unbalanced view of culture as a neutral vehicle readily available for transformation and easy triumphs permeates the movement. These two elements often bleed together into the life of the local church, including some profoundly unhealthy and even explicitly carnal expressions of worship, together with an unholy contextualization when it comes to the proclamation of the gospel. Intramural debates continue about the origins, nature, motives and standards of holiness in a believer. While a few voices call men back to the best expressions of orthodoxy, certain expressions of so-called (with capitals!) New Covenant Theology tend to dominate, together with the nascent antinomianism often bound up in such a theology. A careless ecumenism is evident, in which boundaries that need to be drawn fail to be drawn – men are lauded while mutual basking in reflected human glory beckons, but silence falls when the same men go off the rails theologically. There is a widespread acceptance of charismatic conviction and practice, the general attitude suggesting that such things are neither here nor there. And there is, in some, a distasteful triumphalism and aggressive brashness that exalts the new and the gaudy at the expense of the proven and the faithful. In various ways and at particular points the new Calvinism panders too much to the world, to the fallen culture, to the academy. There are indications of concern for human approval, reliance on worldly means and principles, embrace of worldly models, and subsequent departure from or woolliness on historic orthodox Christianity at various important points. These features make some manifestations of new Calvinism a matter of concern or even outright danger. Because of the nature of the associations that bind many new Calvinists together, there appears a willingness to overlook what ought to be addressed and an unwillingness to reject what ought to be plainly and publicly exposed.

Both strengths and weaknesses are often (though not always) so thoroughly embedded in the same people, churches, organisations and institutions as to make them almost impossible to divide from one another. In many instances, you must take the whole package. I find too much of man’s appetite and glory and wisdom in too many expressions of the new Calvinism for me to be comfortable with the movement as a whole. Too much falls in the gaps with regard to holiness, worship, ecclesiology and polity, too many connections that are not yet being made, or made only by a few brave souls. Every church must consider whether or not we fall into the same traps.

Not everyone who calls himself or is called a new Calvinist is everything that this movement might be, for better or for worse. To be sure, there will be some who are or will soon be asking, “What next?” – seeking a newer wave or the next fad. They pursue not substance but novelty, pandering to their own appetites. But many are or will soon be asking, with a humble sincerity, “What more?” In dealing with such true and earnest brothers in Christ, treat them as I hope you would wish to be treated. Pursue the reputation and the relationships that allow you to speak into such lives with gospel credibility.

To do this we need to be anchored to the truth of Scripture and the church of Christ. Without such anchor points, we have nowhere firm to stand and nothing to offer. An intelligent and wholehearted commitment to a more comprehensive, tried-and-tested expression of scriptural truth provides a buffer against the kind of shocks that drive men and churches off their feet. Adherence to an historic and full-orbed confession of faith is not a panacea, as history proves. Nevertheless, we need to set our feet upon a doctrinal rock where others have shown that a saint can safely stand when buffeted by the winds and waves of falsehood. The preparation for the downgrade of Spurgeon’s day was made by those men who resisted a more complete and binding declaration of the things clearly expressed in and surely believed from the Bible, and who settled instead for a sort of gentleman’s agreement on the sentiments usually denominated evangelical.

In addition, we need to operate within the scripturally-appointed bounds of the local, visible church. It is within the orbit of the local congregation under the care of spiritually qualified, identifiably competent and genuinely accountable men that the saints will best grow in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ. The surest foundation for present and future faithfulness and fruitfulness will be a robustly confessional ecclesiology and a well-grounded churchmanship not subject to the currents of the age or the whims of the demagogues.

I closed The New Calvinism Considered with this counsel, and I stand by it: “be Calvinists. Do not panic blindly. Do not capitulate foolishly. Do not strike wildly. Live before God and be determined to learn of Christ in dependence on the Holy Spirit. Love and serve the triune God above all, and be ready to love and serve his saints wherever you find them, and however your supreme attachment to the Lord of glory demands it.”

Tim Challies has also written a helpful article here.
Aaron Renn has also made a helpful contribution here.  

Wednesday, 26 February 2025

Nehemiah - A New Vision of God

'His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark: sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber.'  Isaiah 56 v 10

This was one of 4 talks given at the Lochee Baptist Chapel Weekend Away at Glenshee in February 2024.  You can listen to the talks here.  

When my late father, the Rev John J Murray, published his little booklet 'The Dog that Does not Bark' in 2017, he subtitled it 'A Heart Cry for Leadership in the Church.'  The booklet is based on the verse from Isaiah 56 v 10. If ever there was a verse that sums up the Scottish church today surely it is this verse. The guard dog of Biblical truth and robust confessionalism in Scotland is not so much whimpering as on life support.  The pragmatists are in the ascendancy.  

The greatest need for Scotland today is godly leaders with Biblical convictions.  Leaders that will speak up when the enemy attacks.  That is why Nehemiah is so relevant for us to study.  Nehemiah is a book about one man’s love for his city, his people, the truth and most importantly his God.  There are many themes running through this book:

• Prayer - Any great work of God starts with prayer.

• Providence - God’s timetable is often hidden from us.

• Revival - It is God who rebuilds, restores and revives.

• God’s calling- God raises up people for a particular task at a particular time and it is often the most unlikely people.  Nehemiah was designed by God for a particular purpose.  When design, purpose and passion come together in godly leaders, great things happen.  

• Team ministry - Everyone of God's people has a part to play in the rebuilding of the kingdom.

• Leadership - Godly leadership is key.  People rally behind godly vision.  

• Corruption - When leadership becomes corrupted and compromised God will not bless the work.

• Worship - Worship is central to the life of the people of God.

But before the walls are rebuilt, before any vision is cast, we see Nehemiah in prayer.  And what we see in this prayer is Nehemiah's view of God.  It was very different view of God from the people of God exiled in Babylon.  

But before we look more at Nehemiah's vision of God lets think a bit more about the background to the book.

Context

Nehemiah is a book about restoration, rebuilding and reformation.  Nehemiah is set at time when everything was bleak.

Restoration

The background is that after Israel divided into the Northern and Southern kingdom, the ten tribes of Israel were taken into exile by the Assyrians.  Later Judah was taken in to exile by the Babylonians.  Jerusalem was destroyed. The loss was catastrophic spiritually, culturally and socially.  The people were taken to a strange land where they were forced to sing the songs of Zion in exile.

Rebuilding

The Babylonians were eventually defeated by the Medes and the Persians and after 70 years, under King Cyrus, the Jews began to return in stages.  While Nehemiah completes the rebuilding of the walls in 52 days, the restoration actually takes 90 years and covers the books of Ezra and Nehemiah.

Reformation

But the problems were not just structural or economic, there was a deep spiritual problem with the people of Judah.  They had departed from God,  They had forgotten the law and they had become idolaters.  There was an urgent need for spiritual and moral renewal.  That is what we see in chapters 8-10.  A revival takes place as Ezra reads the law.  They rediscover the Bible just like Scotland did in the reformation in the 16th century.  The word of God helps us to rediscover the character of God.

But how does this final stage of restoration and rebuilding and reformation start?  Well, God raises up a man and gives him a God shaped vision.   Nehemiah is driven by purpose and passion to do God’s will.  But it all starts with prayer.  And through Nehemiah’s prayer, we see his deep reverence and love for God.  Nehemiah is clearly a man of deep emotion.  He hears the news of the state of Jerusalem from his brother.  He weeps and he fasts, and he turns to God out of concern for his brethren.

What can we learn from this remarkable prayer?  Nehemiah recaptures a true vision of God.

1. His Greatness

The Jews had forgotten who God was.  Despite all that he had done for them, they had forgotten his mighty deeds, his redemptive work and his mighty power.  But in this prayer, Nehemiah once again has a vision of who God is.  He 'beseeched' the Lord in verse 5 – it is repeated in v 11.  Nehemiah addresses God as ‘the God of heaven’ 1 v 4,5. The term ‘God of heaven’ is used numerous times throughout the Bible, emphasizing God’s supreme authority and transcendent nature.  This title serves to remind them, and us, of God’s ultimate control and his ability to guide the destinies of nations and individuals alike.  It underscores the belief that God’s authority is not confined to the earth but encompasses the entire universe.

Nehemiah goes on to confess that God is 'great and awesome'.  The AV translates this as ‘the great and terrible God.’  Nationally and personally, we are to reverently fear God.  Spiritual renewal begins with an apprehension of who God is.

The Israelites had forgotten so it is no surprise that Nehemiah uses the word ‘remember’ over and over again.  In Ch 4 v 14 Nehemiah says: ‘Do not be afraid of them, remember the Lord, who is great and awesome, and fight for your brothers, your sons, your daughters, your wives, and your homes.’  That is why we see the word ‘remember’ so often in the Bible: 232 times we are commanded to remember – 55 times in the Psalms.  We are a forgetful people.  The Psalms help us to remember the mighty acts of God towards his people in the past.

If we had a true understanding of who God is our churches, our ministers, our worship would be very different.  We desperately need the broken and contrite spirit in our worship again.  


2. His Nearness

But notice also in this prayer Nehemiah’s focus on God’s covenant faithfulness and mercy. Nehemiah starts with adoration, he focusses on God’s glory and majesty.  But now Nehemiah turns to God’s nearness or his imminence.  God is with his people, despite their backsliding and their unfaithfulness.  He is a God of covenant faithfulness.

We often think of the God of the Old Testament as distant and far away.  But that is wrong.
Moses says in Deut 4 v 7  ‘For what great nation is there, that has a god so near to it as the Lord our God is to us, whenever we call upon him?’  We also see this in the Psalms: ‘The Lord is near to the broken hearted and saves the crushed in spirit.’ Psalm 34 v 18.  ‘We give thanks to you O God, we give thanks, for your name is near. We recount your wondrous deeds,’ Psalm 75 v 1.

God doesn’t desert his people. He is bound up in covenant with them. He judges and chastises them, but he loves them and restores them.  Nehemiah appeals to God on the basis of his covenant promises.  It is not an appeal on the basis of the people’s goodness and faithfulness.   God’s covenant was a covenant of grace with obligations.  Nehemiah is crying to God to remember his covenant faithfulness and mercy.

So we see in this prayer that Nehemiah is filled with worship and the greatness and yet the mercy of God.

3. His Holiness

Next, we see Nehemiah confesses his sin and the sin of the people because he has a true sense of the holiness of God.

The Spirit of Confession

Nehemiah’s confession isn’t reluctant, it isn’t forced, it is genuine.  We are to see here in Nehemiah that we should take sin very seriously.  We see in v 4 Nehemiah’s response to the situation: he weeps, he mourns, he fasts and prays.  Nehemiah’s response to sin is like the Psalmist in Psalm 51:  ‘The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise.’  Like anyone who experiences grace, Nehemiah is broken, he is undone.  As Christ says in Matthew ‘Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted’ Matt 23 v 12.

Nehemiah was exalted by God because he first humbled himself.  This is the spirit in which we should pray, a spirit of deep humility.  Sin is serious, God is holy and we must come to God in a spirit of brokenness and humility.

The Extent of Confession

Nehemiah doesn’t hesitate to confess sin.  He doesn’t go through a priest, he doesn’t do penance, he doesn’t seek an indulgences, he humbly and sincerely confesses sin.  But notice the extent of his confession in v 6.  What have the sins of the people got to do with Nehemiah?  He has been in Susa serving the king faithfully.  But Nehemiah is part of God’s covenant community.  They, as a people had departed from God and therefore Nehemiah confesses their sin.  He doesn’t say ‘forgive those people over there.’  No, he says ‘…let your ear be attentive and your eyes open, to hear the prayer of your servant that I now pray before you day and night for the people of Israel your servants, confessing the sins of the people of Israel, which we have sinned against you.’  Nehemiah is interceding for the people.

Specific Confession

Notice also that Nehemiah is very specific in his confession.  He doesn’t make a general confession, but he confesses the nature and types of sins they have committed as a nation. Nehemiah says we have acted very corruptly.  This word means to destroy, spoil, to corrupt.  Sometimes this word is translated ‘broken’.  God has given them so many privileges, so many blessings but they have destroyed their heritage.  They are like a child who is given an expensive toy at Christmas and breaks in within a few hours.  The way we treat gifts reveals what we think about the gift giver.  But what specifically has Israel done to deserve God’s wrath?  Well they have not obeyed his commands, decrees and laws given by Moses.

4. His Love

Nehemiah ends his prayer with hope.  He again interceded for the people and asks God to remember his past promises.  What was it that God had promised?  He had promised to scatter and to gather.  Nehemiah is quoting from Leviticus 26 v 33.  God told them that if they were disobedient, they would suffer all sorts of consequences, one of which was that they would be scattered.  He warned them about the consequences of idolatry in Deut 4 v 25-27: ‘The Lord will scatter you among the peoples, and only a few of you will survive among the nations to which the Lord will drive you.’

The people were clearly warned again and again.  But yet God is merciful.  He gathers, he saves, he redeems and he forgives.  Nehemiah quotes Deuteronomy 30 v 3 '...then the LORD your God will restore your fortunes and have compassion on you and gather you again from all the nations where he scattered you.'

And where does God want to gather his people to?  The place God has chosen to set his name.  Jerusalem was where the temple was – God’s presence was there – that was why the restoration of Jerusalem was so important.  Nehemiah is about the restoration and reformation of worship.  God wants to gather his people again so they can worship him in the way that he has laid down in his law.  Worship is about worshiping God in the way that he has laid down, not the way that makes us feel better.

God is a gathering God – he is still finding lost sheep through the gospel today.  Even in the midst of great national sin, we are reminded of the wonder of redemption.  God is faithful and loving towards his covenant people.  

Conclusion

Nehemiah has a new vision of God: his greatness, his nearness, his holiness and his love.  He seeks the Lord for 4 months. He prays for success in this great task.  It seems overwhelming and yet the Lord uses Nehemiah to rebuild the walls in 52 days.  Prayer is the powerhouse of the church.  Cyril Barber says in his book on Nehemiah: ‘Nehemiah’s attitude is one of reverence and submission. He knows the self-sufficient do not pray, they merely talk to themselves. The self-satisfied will not pray; they have no knowledge of their need. The self-righteous cannot pray; they have no basis on which to approach God.’  True prayer comes from seeing God’s greatness and yet also being assured of his nearness and his love for those who come with broken and contrite hearts.

Great leaders lead us to see God more clearly.  Nehemiah didn’t draw attention to himself – he directed it towards God.  Nehemiah means ‘The Lord Comforts’.  There is only one who can truly comfort you today.  What you need, what Scotland needs is Christ.  What Scotland needs is leaders who point to Christ, who preach the gospel and who sound the alarm as we sleepwalk in to moral and spiritual collapse.  We need more Nehemiah’s, more watchmen, more barking dogs.

Let me leave you with the words of J.C Ryle written 150 years ago but as fresh as if they were written yesterday:

'There is a common complaint in these latter days that there is a want of power in modern Christianity, and that the true Church of Christ, the body of which He is the Head, does not shake the world in the twentieth century as it used to do in former years. Shall I tell you in plain words what is the reason? It is the low tone of life which is so sadly prevalent among professing believers. We want more men and women who walk with God and before God, like Enoch and Abraham. Though our numbers at this date far exceed those of our Evangelical forefathers, I believe we fall far short of them in our standard of Christian practice. Where is the self-denial, the redemption of time, the absence of luxury and self-indulgence, the unmistakable separation from earthly things, the manifest air of being always about our Master’s business, the singleness of eye, the simplicity of home life, the high tone of conversation in society, the patience, the humility, the universal courtesy which marked so many of our forerunners seventy or eighty years ago? Yes: where is it indeed? We have inherited their principles and we wear their armour, but I fear we have not inherited their practice. The Holy Ghost sees it, and is grieved; and the world sees it, and despises us. The world sees it, and cares little for our testimony. It is life, life—a heavenly, godly, Christ-like life—depend on it, which influences the world. Let us resolve, by God’s blessing, to shake off this reproach. Let us awake to a clear view of what the times require of us in this matter. Let us aim at a much higher standard of practice. Let the time past suffice us to have been content with a half-and-half holiness. For the time to come, let us endeavour to walk with God, to be “thorough” and unmistakable in our daily life, and to silence, if we cannot convert, a sneering world.'

Monday, 23 December 2024

Safe Families: Good Friends who love Deeply

This was a talk given at the Safe Families Scotland Team Away Day, June 2024

'The call to genuine love has profound implications for our families, our churches and the watching world.  Love forges diverse friendships, preserves marriages in the face of disappointment, protects children, restores people to the truth, reconciles relationships after misunderstanding or wrongdoing, welcomes the marginalised and outcast, and demonstrates a countercultural way of living that ensures people will know that we are Christians by our love.  And the love we have for the lost leads us to practice radical hospitality, welcoming those who are different from us.'  Crossway Daily Devotional.

What is our vision for Safe Families?  That's easy right?  Its on the wall of our offices: No one should feel alone. We exist to create relationship and connection because everyone deserves to belong.  But what underpins our vision?  We need a vision that outlasts any one person, any office move, any contract loss.  We need a vision that is bold, Biblical and enduring.

I guess the question I’ve always asked is what fuels hope?  What brings transformation into the lives of parents and children?  What fuels hope is connection and compassion.

Some of you might have heard of Bobby Herrera, Co-Founder and President of the Populos Group.  He has written a great book called The Gift of Struggle.  After the Second World War war millions of Mexicans lined up to become ‘bracero’s’ in the US. Only 300,000 a year were chosen.  They had to work long hours in terrible conditions.  Bobby’s father became a Bracero in 1954.  His family joined him in 1964.  Bobby was one of 13 kids and as a teenager he worked 10 hours, 6 days per week.  Bobby talks about how he felt invisible as a kid goring up in poverty.  When his mum sent him to the grocery store to get milk he hid behind the dumpster until nobody was looking so nobody would see him using food stamps.  He used to make a big distraction in the dinner que at school so nobody would see the staff ticking his name off the free school meals. 

But one day, when Bobby was 17, his brother Ed and he were returning from a basketball game.  Bobby and his brother couldn’t afford to buy meals on school trips so when the bus stopped at a restaurant, they stayed on the bus and ate their packed lunch.  It was routine for them to miss out on a burger, so they were beyond embarrassment.  But as Bobby and Ed were about to eat their packed lunch, one of their team mates fathers came on to the bus, Mr Teague. ‘Bobby,’ he said, ‘it would make me very happy if you would allow me to buy you boys dinner so you can join the rest of the team.  No one else has to know.  To thank me, you just have to do the same thing in the future for another great kid like you.’

Bobby says that for the first time in his life he didn’t feel socially invisible.  That one act of kindness changed his life. Years later he phoned up Mr Teague to thank him and Mr Teague broke down on the phone. Now, wherever Bobby goes he tells the bus story. 

I guess we all have a bus story.  One, or perhaps several, acts of kindness that gave us hope in the darkness. In Romans, Paul gives us a masterclass in theology.  In the first 11 chapters he explains what the gospel of grace looks like.  He explains God’s wrath on unrighteousness, how nobody is righteous, the need to trust in God’s righteousness in Christ, the need for faith, how a sinner is justified, life in the Spirit, how we are heirs with Christ in glory, how nothing can separate us from the love of Christ.  And then in chapters 12-15, Paul explains what a Christian should look like.  What are the practical implications of being a justified sinner?  Three things:

-         Sacrifice v 1-2

-         Service v 3-8

-         Love v 9-21

What does Christian love look like?

1. It is genuine Rom 12 v 9-10

As The Message says: ‘Love from the centre of who you are, don’t fake it.’ 

‘Let love be genuine.’  Our love is to be sincere and without hypocrisy.   As the AV says ‘Let love be without dissimulation.’  We are not to hold back with our love – it is to be expressed freely and generously. 

But love is not to be fluffy and sentimental.  Christian love hates what is evil and challenges injustice.  Love and righteousness go hand in hand.  ‘Abhor what is evil; cleave to what is good.’  Loving others means taking a stand against evil. 

Our vision in Safe Families is to empower the church and Christians to show love and kindness to the widow, the orphan and the stranger, sincerely and authentically.  As Christians, we don't believe in tick box love.  

We want to fight the systems that lead to injustice and inequality.  Its not fair that a kid form care is more likely to go into prison.  Its not fair that a kid in poverty doesn’t get to access activities that other kids do.

Love can and does change the world.  Love puts others first:  ‘Outdo one another in showing honour.’  Or as The Message says: ‘Practice playing second fiddle.  When we love, the invisible become visible. 

2. It is persistent Rom 12 v 11-13

Love perseveres.  In some ways its easy to love, but its very difficult to persevere in love.  Christian love is energetic.   

‘Don’t burn out; keep yourselves fuelled and aflame.  Be alert servants of the Master, cheerfully expectant.  Don’t quit in hard times; pray all the harder.  Help needy Christians; be inventive in hospitality.’  The Message, Romans 12 v 11-13.

Christian love doesn’t burn out, it doesn’t quit, it doesn’t give up on people because they are a waste of space.

That is our vision at Safe Families.  We go where others haven’t and where many don’t want to go. We stay the course with families that people have washed their hands of.  We believe in ‘inventive hospitality’. 

How can we use our homes, our spare bedroom, our spare time to love those on the margins of our society?  

3,  It is inclusive Rom 12 v 14 - 21.  

Love can be genuine and persistent, but it can by picky.  Most Christians have no problem showing hospitality, as long as it to people who look like them and share their views on the Bible. 

But the uncomfortable thing about the Bible is it says that Christian love involves loving even those who hate us.  We are to feed our enemy and offer him a drink. We are not to condemn the teenage mum, we are to welcome her in and love her. 

Paul commands us not to haughty but to associate with the lowly.  Never be conceited.  ‘Make friends with nobodies, don’t be the great somebody.’

Love crosses divides. What else but the love of God will cause a Russian and a Ukrainian or a Jew and a Palestinian to break bread together. 

Isn’t it amazing how much Christian theology is framed around food and eating together?  Christian love is shown through hospitality, by eating and drinking with our enemies and by gathering together around the Lord’s supper.  It is a picture to us that one day all God’s people will be together at the marriage supper of the lamb. 

What is our vision?  We want to create thousands of bus moments for families across Scotland. 

We want to show love that is genuine, love that is persistent and love that is inclusive.  As it says in Romans 12 v 9-10: ‘Love from the centre of who you are; don't fake it.  Run for dear life from evil.  Hold on for dear life to what is good.  Be good friends who love deeply, practice playing second fiddle.’

 Safe Families is being good friends who love deeply. 



Wednesday, 11 December 2024

Hope and Belonging - 10 Years of Safe Families in Scotland

This was a talk I gave at an event to celebrate 10 years of Safe Families. The event was at The Faith Mission on 26th October 2024.

Well, it’s great to see so many friends here today to join in this celebration of 10 years of hope and belonging for families.

As we look back and look forward, we wanted to do that with the people that had made all this possible, our staff, volunteers and supporters.

Looking back

Nearly 30 years ago I started my career in social work not very far from here in Howdenhall road.  I still remember my first shift in Howdenhall Secure Unit in November 1995.

We were working with some of the most damaged and traumatised children in Scotland.

Some of them were violent but most of them were just scared, lonely kids who were desperate for love and a sense of belonging.

I still remember taking 2-3 kids sledging on Christmas Day because they had no safe home to go to.

I remember thinking at the time ‘how is our system so dysfunctional that we allow children to get to the point where they need to be locked up in units that cost £5-6k per week?

Wouldn’t it be better for children, for society, for cost efficiency that we get involved with families earlier before the damage is done?

Why don’t we design services around what families need and want rather than waiting until children need to come into care?

Why don’t services conform to family’s needs rather silos and departments designed by accountants rather than practitioners?

So often we don’t step back and ask the simple question: what actually brings change?

How are people transformed?  What gives people hope?

When we are in crisis, when we are feeling low, we seek out the people we love don’t we?
Its connection that fuels hope. Its love that sustains and fortifies us.  Its community that makes us feel safe and supported.

Some of us need professional services, but most of the time we prefer informal support don’t we?  What if we could create a service like that?  

So, when I first heard about Safe Families, I didn’t need much persuading.


The question was, could it become a reality in Scotland?

In 2013 I was working for Bethany Christian Trust and I saw first hand what could be done in partnership with the local church to eradicate homelessness.  Partnership, collaboration, vision could create night shelters, deliver food on the streets, provide addiction services and support churches to offer hope in deprived communities.  What if we could partner with churches to offer hope and belonging to families?  And so, in October 2014 Safe Families was born.  If it wasn't born, its future was certainly cemented in a coffee shop at the top of Leith Street when Lyn Hair and I met and I asked her if she would come on as out first Senior Family Support Manager.

I want to pay tribute to Lyn today. I don’t think I’m exaggerating to say that if it wasn’t for Lyn, there would be no Safe Families in Scotland.  Lyn was our first family support worker, volunteer trainer, volunteer assessor, grant application writer, staff trainer and many, many other things.  Thanks Lyn, we appreciate all that you brought to Safe Families over so many years.

Over the last 10 years we have grown and developed.  Our big breakthrough was in 2018 with a big contract with CEC that lasted for 5 years.  That funding came to an end last year but we are delighted that in the middle of an incredibly challenging financial environment, we have got new funding in Edinburgh that will take us through to 2026.  Safe Families will be involved in family support hubs where families can get the help they need when they need it.

We have had the privilege of touching the lives of 100’s of families.

From October 2014 Safe Families in Scotland have:
  • Received 1640 referrals
  • Visited over 1000 families
  • Connected 764 families to a volunteer
450 in Edinburgh

107 ML

81 EL

90 WL
  • Hosted 47 families
  • 1682 children have benefited
  • 451 volunteers have supported a family
We are now in 9 local authorities in Scotland and around 55 around the UK.  Over the next year we will work with around 280 families in the course of one year across Scotland.  We are now in the Western Isles, the Lothians, Perth, Fife, Clackmannanshire, Aberdeenshire and we are in discussions with Stirling and there is in interest in the Borders and Falkirk.

As I have often said, Safe Families for me, is about ordinary people doing extraordinary things.  It’s about a volunteer knocking on a door where hope is in short supply, and offering love and connection.

And we see that in our outcomes:

· 95% of families have maintained or increased their social networks

· 93% have maintained or increased their happiness and wellbeing

· 92% have increased their confidence and self esteem

· 89% have maintained or increased their physical needs

· 91% reported that their family relationships had maintained or improved

· And 92% reported that their positive parenting had maintained or improved.

These outcomes are great but it’s the love and compassion behind these percentages that bring transformation to families.

Tomorrow, I’m speaking on Luke 10 – ‘who is my neighbour?’  Is your community just the people you like? Just the people who look like you?  Or are we called to stop and pick up the people who have been battered by others and have been left for dead.  The thing about a good Samaritan is that its messy. That’s why the Priest and the Levite walked past.  Its much easier to go to an elders meeting, or a finance committee or a Presbytery.  There are nice, neat agenda’s and there is a beginning and an end.

Safe Families is about the spare place at our table.  Radical hospitality with no strings attached.  It’s not just about offering a better service, its about creating a more compassionate society.  As Dr Thomas Guthrie often said, ‘an ounce of prevention is worth a ton of cure.’

Many of you have loved the one in front of you so well.  Today is a chance to for us to say thank you and to celebrate together this milestone in the history of Safe Families.

We’ve had some amazing events over the years –
  • Family Fun Days at Arniston House
  • Our 5-year anniversary in the Scottish Parliament,
  • Our Black-Tie event back in April at Inchyra.
We have. and continue to have some amazing staff who bring hope and belonging into the lives of families every day.

But when I look back on the last 10 years – the thing I want to celebrate the most is the unseen and the ordinary.
  • The text to a struggling mum in her darkest moment during lockdown.
  • The volunteer taking out a child who is struggling with crippling anxiety.
  • The volunteers who take out the non-verbal neuro-diverse boy so his granny can have a couple of hours to herself.
  • To the volunteer who helps a mum to empty rubbish bags that have been filled with dirty nappies form months.
  • To the volunteer who still meets a mum months after the support has officially come to an end.
  • The volunteer who takes the teenager with no confidence to the careers fayre.

Amazing acts of love and kindness that never hit the headlines and never results in publicity.

That for me is Safe Families, and that is what we are here ore celebrate today.  Somebody once said: ‘I’m not interested in whether you’ve stood with the great: I’m interested in whether you’ve sat with the broken.’

Thank for all of you who have done that so well.  Through your love, you have given 100's of children the most amazing memories in the midst of really tough times.  

As Fredrick Douglass once said: 'It is so much easier to build strong children than repair broken men' and I want to thank for all you have done to help children to thrive over the last 10 years.



Looking forward

Today as we stand at the crossroads of hopefully another 10 years, we are a new merged organisation with our friends from Home for Good.  Not only are we supporting families, but we are also seeking to find homes for young people who desperately need love and security.  Home for Good have excellent resources and training to encourage more people to foster, adopt or provide supported lodgings to teenagers.  If you are exploring fostering you can speak to the enquiry team here.  You can also sign up for an information event.

When Safe Families started in 2014 there were 15,500 looked after children in Scotland.  Today that number has reduced to 12,206.  It is great to see this number reduced, but for too many of our children we are still failing as a country.  20-30% of these children who are looked after will go on to be involved in the criminal justice system.

For the 3004 children who entered the care system in Scotland last year, around 700 of them are waiting for foster care, adoption and supported lodgings.  This is a huge opportunity for the church in Scotland to step forward.

Imagine if every church becomes a haven for families in crisis and a church where foster carers and adopters feel loved and supported by their church community?  Our vision is for a country where nobody feels alone because everyone deserves to belong.  We want to create relationship and connection so families experience love and hope in the midst of crisis.  

Over the last week we were looking at Matthew 10 when Jesus commissions the 12.  He said to his disciples ‘Freely you have received, freely give.’  We want to freely give as we seek to get alongside family who are desperate for hope and belonging in Scotland today.

We would love to expand our scope and reach, and we can only do that with partnering with more supporters, churches and local authorities.

Thank you for all you’ve done and as we look forward to the next 10 years, we would love for you to come on this journey with us.

Please spread the word to friends, to churches that together, we can make a difference.  As Martin Luther King often said 'lets, together, build a tunnel of love through the mountain of despair.'

For more information about Safe Families please click on this link.

If you would like to access some great training, sign up here.



Monday, 9 December 2024

A New Season - the launch of Trail Consultancy

I don't often share personal news on my blog but I wanted to let everyone know that after 9 very happy years at Safe Families I've decided to go in a new direction.  

Last May (2024) I attended the Keswick Leadership Course which helped me to reflect on where I was at and where I was going.  If you want a refresh on your leadership, I can't recommend a leadership retreat highly enough.  Other than feedback, a new perspective is one of the few ways our leadership will grow and flourish.  The Keswick Leadership Course brings together 20 leaders and, combines incredible content, great group work and individual coaching. During the week I felt a strong sense that my time in Safe Families had come to an end and I was being called to something new.  

During a session on identity and personal purpose we were asked what our personal values were and then we were asked to wrestle with the the following questions:

  • What gifts or talents have always come naturally to you?
  • When do you lose track of time?
  • What are you truly passionate about?
  • Where do you find energy?
  • What are you known for being exceptional at?
  • What would you do if you didn't need to earn money?
  • What makes you angry?
  • What change do you want to see in the world?
We were then encouraged to come up with a personal purpose statement.  Something happened that week that led me a new direction.  I've always been drawn to coaching and developing others, I love casting vision, I love new ideas, seeing leaders communicate passionately, and seeing people grow and flourish.  So somewhere in the Lake District, driving between Keswick and Ullswater the idea of a coaching/leadership business was born.   What is was called or what it looked like wasn't clear.  

During June, after a walk with a leader around the Murieston Trail, the name came to me.  After a bit of soul searching and a very nice steak dinner with my future business partner, Jonathan Innes, of Innes and Partners,Trail Consultancy was registered in 2024.  I'm very thankful to Fin Macrae at Dufi Art for some lovely logos.  

So what is Trail Consultancy for?  What is our leadership philosophy? 

Einstein once said 'If I had a an hour to figure out the most important question in the universe, I would sped the first 55 minutes making sure I understood the question' (quoted in R. Michael Andersons book 'Leadership Mindset 2.0).  So much of leadership is about awareness.  What is really going on here?  So often we need to slow down and get to the heart of the real issue.

But lets be honest, leadership is difficult.  There is no blueprint, no handbook and often there is nobody to guide you.  Leadership is not so much a destination but a journey and it important who you have with you.  Many of us were very competent managers and then we become leaders.  We need to move from doer's to conductors.  Many people simply never make this change.  

Trail Consultancy was set up to support leaders, teams and organisations to find purpose and direction so they can grow and flourish.  We don't want to see burnout and exhausted leaders we want to see leaders filled with energy and vision.  

We want to support leaders to slow down, take stock and recalibrate their direction and focus.  A coherent vision, communicated passionately can inspire teams and organisations to greatness. When teams have a shared and purpose driven vision, and where there is a culture of trust and belonging, great things can be achieved and staff can flourish.

We believe that great leaders, teams and organisations have four things which set them apart:

Passion – great leaders inspire followers.  This is why the character and identity of the leader is so important.  Personal development, learning and perspective allow leaders to inspire followers.  The modern obsession with micromanagement is killing creativity in many organisations.  Leaders need to rediscover what led them in to leadership, cast vision and communicate that passionately.   

Purpose – leadership is about a clear sense of direction.  Great leaders inspire others with a clear and coherent vision and create a culture of trust and belonging.  Trail wants to help leaders, teams and organisations to find a sense of direction and purpose.  When you know where you are going, it a lot easier when the storms hit.  Leadership is like the captain of a ship trying to chart a course often through choppy waters.  Keeping a steady course is so important to great leadership.

People – Your greatest asset is your team.  Investing in your team, creating a values driven culture sets organisations apart from their competitors.  Hiring the right people and setting the right culture are critical for success.  Trail can help you look at culture and systems to make your organisation great.

Perseverance – Great leaders get back up when they are knocked down.  They persevere and push through.  Maybe you feel you have lost your passion and purpose after a busy season, let Trail Consultancy walk with you as you seek to find a new perspective.  


We are officially launching in February 2025 but we are open to discussions about prospective work.  

We are offering the following services:

Leadership Coaching – Trail Consultancy can help leaders to grow and develop in their role through 1:1 coaching.  Leadership is all about finding your passion and purpose and then continuing to grow and flourish.  We can offer personal and team coaching to work through issues, support with a crisis or help during a time of change and transition. 

Communication and presentation – We can help you to communicate more effectively both internally and externally.  We can help you to think through your message, how you are delivering your message and also support you and your team to present with clarity and passion. 

Developing resilient and healthy teams – Culture is key to effectiveness and impact.  Trail Consultancy can help you develop a healthy culture and develop systems for staff to grow and flourish.  Recruitment, induction and managing staff are crucial to a great organisation and Trail can support you with this.  As R. Michael Anderson says in his book 'Leadership Mindset 2.0': 'Great leaders do not create followers; they create more leaders.'

Governance and financial health check – Trail Consultancy can provide  governance advice and a financial stability check so your organisation has the structures and stability necessary to plan for the future.  Good governance is critical to organisations and charities building a strong and stable future.  

If you would like to get in touch with us please email us here:

Trail Consultancy info@trailconsultancy.co.uk 

Website: https://trailconsultancy.co.uk/ 



Saturday, 7 December 2024

Good News for the Poor - an interview with the Banner of Truth

This was an interview I recently gave at the Banner of Truth.  I chat a little about shinty, my background, how I came to Christ, my research and writing on Dr Thomas Guthrie and my work over the last 9 years with Safe Families.  If you want to know more about Safe Families and support the work please click on this Safe Families  


Thursday, 7 November 2024

Thomas Boston - A Model of Pastoral Diligence

This was a talk given by late father, Rev John J Murray at the Banner Border Conference 2001.

Thomas Boston is universally recognised as a pastor, theologian and writer of considerable significance. 

Jonathan Edwards spoke of him as 'a truly great divine'.

'One of the brightest lights in the firmament of the Reformed Church in Scotland.', in the opinion of Principal John Macleod

'If Scotland had been searched during the earlier part of the 18th century there was not a minister within its bounds who, alike in personal character, and in the discharge of his pastoral function, approached nearer the apostolic model than did this man of God' - Dr Andrew Thomson

'Thomas Boston was a common place genius. Not a common place man but a common place genius'. Rabbi Duncan

Somebody once said: '[Thomas Boston] did more to fan the flame of true piety in Scotland than that of any other single minister in his generation.'


Summary of his life

Boston laboured in two of the most remote and desolate parishes in the country and ministered in the most difficult times.  He faced the most heart-rending trails and difficulties in personal and family life yet he overcame and is a model of pastoral success in the most difficult times.

It is to the enrichment of future generations that Thomas Boston left Memoirs of his lifetime and writings, divided into twelve periods addressed in the first instance to his children. It is a spiritual classic.

1. A remarkable conversion

He was born on the 17th March 1676 in the Border town of Duns. He was the youngest of seven children. His parents belonged to the humbler middle class.

At an early age he went to school. 'The schoolmistress having her chamber in my father's house I was early put to school; and having a capacity for learning and being of towardly disposition, was kindly treated by her; often expressing her hope of seeing me in the pulpit'. About the age of seven he 'began to conceive a remarkable pleasure in reading the Bible'. At the age of 8 he went to the Grammar school in Duns.

His parents were godly conscientious Presbyterian folk who refused to bend to prelatic authority and suffered severely for it. His father John Boston was cast into Duns prison for non-conformity. One of Thomas' earliest memories was being of taken to prison to provide company for his father in his loneliness. 'When I was a little boy I lay in the prison of Duns with him to keep him company.'

'During the first years of my being at the Grammar School I kept the Kirk punctually, where I heard those of the Episcopal way; that being the national establishment; but I knew nothing of the matter, save to give suit and presence within the walls of the house; living without God in the world, unconcerned about the state of my soul, till the year 1687.'

It was in that year that James II granted the Presbyterians liberty of worship. One of those free to exercise his ministry unmolested was Henry Erskine, the father of Ebenezer and Ralph, the founders of the Secession. He was invited by the Presbyterians of the hamlet of Rivelaw near Whitsome, only some 5 miles from Duns, to minister to them. John Boston was not the man to listen to the curate in the parish of Duns when a saint and a sufferer like Henry Erskine were preaching 5 miles from his door. Considerable numbers of the Duns people, weary of the sapless and Christless preaching to which they had been constrained to listen in their native town, gladly walked to Whitsome each Sunday.

John Boston took his 11-year-old son to Whitsome and it was under Erskine's preaching that Thomas was effectually converted to Christ. 'My father took me thither and laid me in Christ's way'. He writes in his account

'By whose means it pleased the Lord to awaken me and bring me under exercise about my soul's state, being then going on in the 12th year of my age. After that I went back no more till the Episcopalians were turned out: it was the common observation in these days that whenever one turned serious about his soul's state and case he left them.'

He refers to his conversion in his Soliloquy on the Art of Man Fishing:

'Little wast thou thinking, O my soul on Christ, heaven, or thyself when thou went to the Newton of Whitsome to hear a preaching when Christ first dealt with thee; there thou got an unexpected cast'.

'I know I was touched quickly after the first hearing, wherein I was like one amazed with some new and strange thing.'

Erskine's ministry continued to be richly blessed to Thomas so that he would walk those 5 miles. come wind come weather, to obtain food for his soul and refreshment for his spirit:

'In the winter sometimes it was my lot to go alone, without so much as a horse to carry me through Blackadder water, the wading whereof in sharp frosty weather I very well remember. But such things were then easy, for the benefit of the Word, which came with power.'

He and two other boys from the school 'met frequently in a chamber in my father's house for prayer, reading the Scripture and spiritual conference; whereby we had some advantage, both in point of knowledge and tenderness.'

Here the true foundation was laid in Boston's life. Here his life long habits of self-examination, prayer and Bible reading with systematic meditation were formed at that time.

2. The call to the ministry

John Boston had doubtless by this time resolved that his youngest son should be a minister, and the son himself, before his school days were over, had secretly set his heart upon the same calling. There were difficulties in the way. The Boston's were not rich and Thomas thought of turning to a trade but his father would not hear of it. He was apprenticed to Alexander Cockburn, a notary in the town. This employment continued for two years and as he acknowledged proved of great usefulness in later life both in study and in the clerkships of Presbytery and Synod.

The Call: 'He brought it through many difficulties, tried me with various disappointments, at length carried it to the utmost point of hopelessness, seemed to be laying the gravestone upon it at the time of my mother's death: and yet after all he brought it to pass; and that has been the usual method of Providence with me all along in matters of the greatest weight'

At length he entered Edinburgh University in 1691. He studied unweariedly and he lived on scanty fare. Fearful of exhausting his father's slender purse he practised an economy that is notable even in a Scottish student. When he graduated in 1694 his College expenses - fees, maintenance and all - had only mounted up to some £14. We cannot wonder that he experienced bouts of fainting and a permanently weakened constitution.

In the summer of 1694 Boston received the bursary from the Presbytery of Duns and after an autumn spent in the private study of divinity, he entered on his theological course in Edinburgh at the beginning of 1695. Dr George Campbell filled the theological chair. He spent only one session there and chose to complete his studies under the Presbytery while supporting himself by working as a tutor. He became tutor to Andrew Fletcher the stepson of Lieutenant Colonel Bruce of Kennet, near Clackmannan, where he remained for about a year.

'Finding myself providentially settled there, in the character I bore, I judged myself obliged in conscience to seek the spiritual good of the family, and to watch over them and see to their manners. Accordingly I kept up family worship, catechised the servants, pressed the careless to secret prayer, reproved and warned against sinful practices, and earnestly endeavoured the reformation of the vicious'. (p 25)

To the end of his life Boston looked back on that year with the Kennets as a thriving time for his soul.

'The time I was at Kennet continues to be unto me a remarkable time among the days of my life…

Though it was heavy to me that I was taken from the school of divinity and sent to Kennet; yet I am convinced God sent me to another school there, in order to prepare me for the work of the Gospel, for which he had designed me: for there I learned in some measure what it was to have the charge of souls; and being naturally bashful, timorous, and much subject to the fear of man, I attained by what I met there, to some boldness, and not regarding the persons of men when out of God's way. There I learned that God will countenance one in the faithful discharge if his duty, though it be not attended with the desired success; and that plain dealing will impress an awe on the party's conscience, though their corruption still rages against him that so deals with them' (p 29-30).

On 15th June 1697 he was licensed by the Presbytery of Duns and Chirnside. His preaching soon began to attract attention. There was a force and freshness in it that arrested the common people. One would have thought that such a preacher would have been settled soon. The call although nominally in the hands of the people was practically in the hands of the principal heritor or landlord. In seven different parishes when the popular voice was for choosing Boston hostile forces intervened. He was a probationer for two years and three months.

3. Boston's first pastorate in Simprin

At length the heritor and people of one small parish was found to be agreed. It was the parish of Simprin in the rich country of the Merse about 8 miles south-east of Duns.

There is recorded in the Memoirs, his struggle to know the mind of the Lord 'with respect to the affair of Simprin'.
  1. The rarity of the godly there, and in the country
  2. The very smallness of their number
  3. The smallness of the stipend; moreover
  4. The temper and way of the fraternity, though good men not agreeable to mine
  5. The main thing that then stuck with me, The little opportunity to be serviceable there.
He was ordained there on 21st September 1699.

The little church measured some 15' by 60'. There was no manse. For the first three years of his ministry he was the tenant in old house at the west end of the town. It was not until 1702 that a new manse was built.

Boston had but 88 examinable persons. He discovered that such was the ignorance of the people that he needed to give the most elementary teaching. When he went there was only one home in which there was family worship. The Lord's Supper had not been observed for several years.

Before the first year was past his little parish was thoroughly organised. There was a forenoon and afternoon service. There was an evening meeting for the study of the Catechism. Every Tuesday a meeting for praise and prayer. Every Thursday in winter in the evenings and in summer in the daytime, there was a weekday service. Diets of catechising were held at regular intervals. Every household was regularly visited. Boston deliberately gave his best to what he called 'his handful'.

Habits were formed and his methods of devotion and study fashioned for good. It was here he found how the tone of the week is lowered by plunging into worldly business on Monday morning and it was here he formed the lifelong habit of spending the first hours of Monday in prayer. It was there that he first prepared himself systematically for family worship and opened morning family worship to any from the parish who wished to join with the family. Here began those family fasts. Above all it was at Simprin that Boston awoke to the sanctifying power of dogged work.

No pulpit work won by such prayer and fasting and study can long be powerless. There was a growing interest and a widening response until at last the little church was unable to accommodate the crowds especially at communion seasons. After seven years and eight months of concentrated labour there he could exclaim: 'Simprin! O blessed be he for his kindness at Simprin' 'I will ever remember Simprin as a field which the Lord had blessed'.

After seven years there was not a house without family worship.

4. Ettrick - Boston's second pastorate

It was with great reluctance that Boston moved from Simprin. The thing that seemed to influence Boston to Ettrick was its spiritual desolation. In the early centuries the district was covered with forest - Ettrick Forest. There were not more than 400 inhabitants. As late as 1792 the writer of the Statistical Account supplies a somewhat doleful description of his parish: 'This parish possess no advantages. The roads are almost impassable.'

The manse at Ettrick was in a ruinous state. 'Having hitherto had a sorry habitation in the old manse, it was this summer razed, and a new one built; I and my family, in the meantime living in the stable and bar; in the former of which were made a chimney and a partition'.

The people of that place were full of pride and self-assurance and deceit.  It was a sorely broken parish. The smouldering discontent with the Revolution Settlement had been fanned into a flame by Cameronians from the west. 'The common talk was all of separation, and of the lawfulness of attending service in the parish church'

'There were three parties in the place; 
1. the dissenter followers of John Macmillan and a considerable number who have been all along unto this day a dead weight on my ministry in this place 
2. an heritor in the parish with two elders dependants of his deserted the ordinances for 10 years 
3. the congregation of my hearers under the disadvantage of what influence these two parties could have upon them. There appetite for the ordinances I did not find to be sharpened by the long fast they had got, for about the space of four years'.

A four years' vacancy had wrought its natural effect. Services were irregular and the Lord's Supper had not been administered. People had lost the art of attention during service. Men had grown careless. They had lost the art of decent attention during service. They gossiped so noisily in the churchyard in time of sermon that one of the elders had to be told off to keep order there.

The lax morality

The vice of swearing was widespread. 'One thing I was particularly surprised with viz the prevalency of the sin of profane swearing; and was amazed to find blessing and cursing proceeding out of the same mouth; praying persons, and praying in their families too, horrid swearers at times.' He speaks of the frequent sin of uncleanness. what with fornication, what with adulteries, the place of repentance has been seldom empty since the planting of this parish.'

The first ten years were a hard struggle. After 8 years he told his wife 'My heart is alienated from this place.' What kept him there was the sad plight of the people if he left them.

But in the long run faith and prayer and study began to have their effect. 'The artless story of his study and his preaching and his daily wrestling with God, surrounded and shadowed as he was, is one of the noblest records that were ever penned. Slowly and surely his influence grew. Men felt the trust and power of his preaching. His fame spread. One of his action sermons had been published and word began to steal into the valley that it was making a deep impression in Edinburgh. Strange faces became common in the church. Then came the inevitable calls. Ettrick grew convinced at last that in losing Boston they would lose an incomparable minister. When in 1716 Boston came under call to Closeburn in Dumfries-shire a congregational fast was appointed by the session. It was the turning point in parish life. Henceforth he was to minister with a new authority and to be instrument of far larger blessing.

In his last communion in Ettrick he gave out 777 tokens for the Lord's Table.  In the end he outlived the opposition and gained from high and low a place of most remarkable esteem.  His memory is cherished with veneration in Ettrick

5. The influence of his books

Memoirs of Thomas Boston

It was written for his children.  'It is based on a faith in the particular providence of God, in the intimacy of His fellowship with His Children, and in the closeness of the connection between their spiritual and their natural life, the like of which perhaps no man of equal intellectual power ever attained. … The whole practical life of Boston turned on these two principles: first that it was his duty to try to ascertain, and his privilege to know if he tried properly, what the will of God was in relation to every matter, great or small with which he was concerned; and second that things both external and spiritual fell out with him well or ill just as he followed or failed to follow the divine will' Blaikie 197

Human Nature in its Fourfold State

This was his first book. It originated in a series of sermons first preached in Simprin and again in Ettrick. After a serious of mishaps it was published anonymously in 1720

'There is no book of practical divinity, not even William Guthrie's Trial of Saving Interest in Christ, nor Rutherford's Letters, that was more read in the godly homes of Scotland than this treatise. It did more to mould the thought of his countrymen than anything except the Westminster Shorter Catechism. It is of this work that Jonathan Edwards says that it 'shows Mr Boston to have been a truly great divine.' John MacLeod

It was reprinted some 100 times and translated into many languages.  It found its way and it was eagerly read by folks all over the Borders.

The Crook in the Lot

During the final months of his life he had been preparing this book for the press. The material first given as sermons was etched out of the sufferings that Thomas and Catherine had endured together. The subtitle is 'The Sovereignty and wisdom of God in the Afflictions of men, together with a Christian deportment under them.'

1) whatever crook there is in one's lot it is of God's making

2) that whatever God sees meet to mar, no one will be able to mend in his lot

3) that the considering of the crook in the lot as the work of God -that is of His making - is the proper means to bring one to a Christian deportment under it

This book has taught countless other Christian people to accept with meekness those sufferings appointed for them by a sovereign and merciful God.

A Soliloquy on the Art of Man-fishing 

This was penned during his time of probation. While reading the Scripture in private the words of Matthew 4.19 'Follow me and I will make you fishers of men' deeply impressed him and his heart 'cried out ' for their accomplishment. It was a sermonic meditation addressed to himself. No one outside the family saw it till it was published in 1773

6. What made Thomas Boston such an effective Pastor?

A thorough-going conversion work

To Boston conversion began with awakening from spiritual complacency to spiritual unease as one faces the reality of one's sin. This lead on through searching for repentance and faith and a new life with God. That in turn lead to a God-given evidence and confidence that one has been divinely enabled to turn from sin to a self-abandoning trust in Christ as the Sin-bearer and that one's heart has been renewed in the process.

Believing that the fallen human heart is desperately prone to optimistic self-deception the likes of Boston stressed the need for constant self-suspicion and self-examination.  Conversion was a deep and thorough work that led to on going soul exercise and continuous repentance.

An unmistakable call to the ministry.

His sense of call to preaching was strong. He is forever searching his mind and heart on the question of a call. There is no move without God.

'Three things were suggested to me in the call to Simprin

1 Unless I am sure of my call to it from the Lord, how will I stand against the discouragements I will meet with there?

2 How can I think of profiting them, if He send me not to them?

3 How will I stand with them before the tribunal of God, if I join with them without a call from Himself.'

A thorough grasp of theology

Boston was Bible man. Prick him anywhere and his blood is Bibline His preaching: 'There was in it a scriptural fulness that nothing but passionate devotion to the Bible gives'. Morrison 

He had scarcely any books:  'And thus my scarcity of books proved a kind disposal of Providence to me; I in that method arriving at a greater distinctness and certainty in these points, than otherwise I could have obtained' (P168)

The teaching of Thomas Boston was firmly grounded on the Westminster Confession of Faith. He was committed to the federal theology of the Confession. Federal theology organises Christian truth around the covenants of Works Redemption and Grace. .Boston set aside the distinction between the covenant of Redemption and the Covenant of Grace for fear of conditionality entering into the Covenant of grace.

Habits of prayer and self-examination

Boston speaks in one place about a debate he got into with one of the dissenters on communion with God. This SH gave his opinion that it consisted in doing the will of God and keeping his commandments. I told him that all communion was mutual and therefore it could not consist in that and that actual communion with God consists in the Lord's letting down the influence of his grace on the soul and the soul's reacting the same in the exercise of grace. O says he that is extraordinary; wherewith I was stunned. I told him that it was that without which neither he nor I would be saved.

Boston was a man of ardent prayer. Secret prayer was the congenial element in which his spirit lived, moved and had its being'. He did nothing without consulting the will of the Lord. It was the fundamental secret of the man and his ministry .It was manifest when he was a tutor he set aside time for fasting. He had his seasons of prolonged secret devotion in which 'prayer over flowed its banks like Jordan in the time of harvest.'

'Having allotted the morning entirely for prayer and meditation, some worldly thoughts crept in .. In the afternoon I somewhat recovered my forenoon's loss.'

'Which done I thought upon my sins and heart-monsters, till my soul was more humbled in me.'

Rigorous self-scrutiny

Rabbi Duncan said that Boston had a 'pernickety conscience' - one that took note of details of conduct and was intensely self-critical. 'He was accurately and extensively regardful of the divine law, in all manner of life and conversation (even in the things that escape the notice of the most part of Christians).'

'And then what pains he took to put things right again; what seasons he had of fasting and of intense self-scrutiny, and tearing down of idols, and passionate crying and tears - Restore unto me the joy of thy salvation and uphold me with thy free spirit. We may believe that Boston was often too hard on himself; we may believe that the languor he sometime s felt in duty was not due to God's forsaking him but was the natural reaction from a stain too intense and protracted, unrelieved by due rest and relaxation.'

He would be a very blind observer who did not connect this intensity of inward discipline with his great spiritual power.

After that minding to renew the covenant with God and subscribe it with my hand I drew it up in writing Duns August 14 1699 The covenant.

Dr Andrew Bonar used to tell with great solemnity what was said to him at the beginning of his ministry by an old friend and minister: Remember it is a remark of old and experienced men, that very few men, and very few ministers, keep up to the end the edge that was on their spirit at first’ Bonar p 339.

Andrew Bonar ‘One of the gravest perils that besets the ministry is a restless scattering of energies over an amazing multiplicity of interests which leave no margin of time for receptive and absorbing communion with God’.

Diligence in study and in work

Boston was industrious and studious self disciplined and well-organised.  Boston never seemed to rest. Always praying always studying always preaching always visiting always searching his heart drawing up covenants with God;  'Being twelve mile distant from the Presbytery seat, I attended it not in winter; but when I attended I ordinarily went way and returned the same day, being loath to lose two or three days on it.' He ends the Art of Man Fishing with the words 'If Christ should come and find you idle, when he is calling you to work, how will you be able to look him in the face?'

Boldness in declaring the truth

Boston was clear in this particularly during his tutoring in Clackmannan.  As we can see in the Art of Manfishing he would not trim his message to suit the heritors. He feared to soil his conscience by obtaining a parish on the wrong terms.

He renounced the carnal policy of trimmers and time servers who toned God's message down and presented the realities of sin and grace forthrightly, rebuking where necessary, pulling no punches, and leaving the outcome to God.

The Revolution Settlement was a compromise and a spirit of toleration crept. It was bound to do so where you have men within one Church of varying doctrinal views and lifestyles. The old theology began to be discredited and a theology more in harmony with the natural feelings of man began to show its horns.  The Simson case meant that he stood alone in his dissent in General Assembly.

A searching and discriminating ministry

Rutherford took the external character of membership. Boston had a much narrower view of the visible church and its membership. Boston knew true reality and was yearning after reality in the Church. He protested against formalism and indifference. The boundaries between the Church and the world were broken down. The undisguised worldliness of the Church. All who were not Turks or Pagans or Jews had been called Christian.

Boston argued that children derive their right to baptism not from their progenitors, but only from their immediate parents. The children of the promise are those whose parents have repented. Children of ungodly parents have no right to the seals of the covenant. No children but have but such as have at least one parent a visible believer has any right to baptism before the Church. He maintained that if the parents have no right to the table of the Lord then their infants have none to the ordinance of baptism.

1) If profane persons are granted the privilege they are likely to be hardened in their impiety.

2) The children themselves when they come to understand how their parents have lived, and that notwithstanding they had obtained baptism for them they will be inclined to despise as an unreal thing.

If hearing is not mixed with faith of what avail is it?

In Simprin and in Ettrick there was no rush to the sacrament. In Ettrick it was July 1710. This was the first time I administered it in Ettrick…I thought myself obliged to deal with every communicant personally'. Eventually 'in all there were but about fifty-seven persons of our own parish communicants'.

Preaching Christ

It was in the years as a probationer and in Simprin that his apprehension of the Gospel became clearer: 'I had much weakness and ignorance and much of a legal disposition and way, then and for a good time after undiscerned'

While still a probationer 'I began my preaching of the Word in a rousing strain; and would fain have set fire to the devil's nest. The first test I preached on was Ps 50.22 Now consider this I wen for the first two months Speaking with John Dysart of Coldingham (It was reported at Coldingham where most of his parishioners were Episcopalians he cowed opposition by carrying his pistols to the pulpit, and disposing of them there rather ostentatiously') 'But if you were entered on preaching of Christ, you would fine it very pleasant. I have often since that time remembered that word of Mr Dysart's as the first hint given me, by the good hand of my God, towards the doctrine of the Gospel'.

'Meanwhile being still on the scent as I was sitting one day in a house of Simprin, I espied above the window-head two little old books, which when I had taken down I found entitled, the one The Marrow of Modern Divinity the other Christ's blood flowing freely to sinners. These I reckon had been brought home from England by the master of the house, a soldier in the time of the civil wars. Finding them to point to the subject I was in particular concern about, I brought them both away. The latter a book of Saltmarsh's I relished not; and I think I returned it without reading it through. The other being the first part only of the Marrow I relished greatly… I found it to come close to the points I was in quest of and to show the consistency of these which I could not reconcile before. I had apprehended I had taken the hint from the Marrow and I had no great fondness for the conditionality of the covenant of grace'

These things while I was in the Merse gave my sermons a certain tincture which was discerned; though the Marrow from which it sprang, continued in utter obscurity,

He drank the renewing waters of the Marrow and the people drank from his preaching.

The Marrow of Modern Divinity 'The design of the whole is to elucidate and establish the perfect freeness of the Gospel salvation; to throw open the gates of righteousness; to lead up the sinner straight to the Saviour; to introduce him as guilty, perishing and undone; and to persuade him to grasp, without a moment's hesitation, the outstretched hand of God's mercy' (Blaikie p190)

The ground it supplied for a free and universal offer of the Gospel in harmony with Calvinistic doctrine, especially on personal election and particular redemption'.

The ground which the Marrow held to warrant such an offer was expressed by them in terms that God made 'a deed of gift' - a gift of Christ to mankind-sinners, and that every sinner of mankind was warranted and welcome to accept that gift. P191

Perhaps we may say that from this time the person of Christ came more prominently out than before in connection with the proclamation of the Gospel. Men were invited not so much to believe a doctrine of salvation as to entrust themselves to an all-sufficient Saviour

'From the very time of my settling here the great thing I aimed at in my preaching was to impress the people with a sense of their need of Christ, and to bring them to consider the foundations of practical religion' M p227

Earnestness and a passionate concern for souls

'Sin was such an awful thing - in one, around one, ever active, ever spreading its blight, ever offending God -that Boston could not get over it. As he looked into eternity and thought of lost sinners, the gloom gathered, his awe deepened. But this did not prevent him preaching a free and full salvation for all; it rather impelled him to increased earnestness in the proclamation.'

'When his congregation Banner 24 Boston felt deeply in his own heart every word of the Gospel he uttered

'Christ had the good of souls in his eye. When you preach let this be your design, to seek to recover lost sheep. To get some converted and brought to your Master.'

His Sanctified afflictions

'It is the usual way of providence with me that blessing comes through several iron gates.' He was a man of a melancholic disposition. He ate little as a student in order to eek out his father's small resources. He often fainted and appeared to be dying. His condition was so severe that his teeth blackened and gradually dropped out.

'...meanwhile my health was so broken, that I looked rather like one to be transported into the other world, than into my parish.'

He lost both his parents comparatively early; his mother when he was not yet 15 and this event even threatened for a time to put an end to his hopes of entering the ministry) and his father in 1701 when he was not yet 25 and recently settled in Simprin.

A loving and devoted father himself he had the sad experience of laying six of his own bairns in the grave - two while he was in Simprin and four at Ettrick

He himself was often ill suffering from much pain and weakness physically. On receiving the call to ettrick it is said that his health was so broken that he looked rather like one to be transported into another world than into another parish.'

And as though this was not enough his last twelve years were clouded with a great and grievous domestic grief. In the summer of 1720 his wife began to show signs of insanity. This dark eclipse of the spirit, although sometimes diminished seldom wholly passed away. Indeed in later years the gloom became darker still. It touched Boston on his tenderest point. She was confined to an apartment called 'the inner prison' and there she spent months and years the subject of a mental malady which no science or human device could mitigate

'I think I have thereby obtained soul-advantage; more heavenliness in the frame of my heart, more contempt of the world, as the widow that is desolate trusteth in God …more careful to walk with God, and to get evidence for heaven; more resolution for the Lord's work over the belly of difficulties' (ET)

7. Lessons from Bostons Life

The nature of true religion

Boston was striving after reality. 'Labour for the experience of religion in your soul that you may have an argument for the reality of it from your spiritual sense and feeling'.

Rabbi Duncan 'said that he should like to sit at the feet of Jonathan Edwards to learn what true godliness is and at the feet of Thomas Boston to learn how to reach it.'

'It is very certain that it is always to preachers of the type of Henry Erskine and Thomas Boston that men turn when they come to be in earnest about the state of their souls.'

How soft we are How easily we grumble at the least difficulty or affront we encounter

He endured hardship as a good soldier of Jesus Christ.

The nature of the grace of God in the Gospel and the danger of legalism

Legalism is any teaching which either distorts the free grace of God in the Gospel or distort the true nature of God's grace in the law or even fails to place the gracious law of God in its proper place in redemption.

Legalism is a distortion of the Gospel. It is also a distortion of the law. It is disguised in subtle form mixing the way of works with the way of grace. It is possible to have an evangelical mind and a legal heart. An orthodox creed and unsound heart. The men who opposed the Marrowmen were committed to the Westminster Confession.

For Boston the great danger was the new legalism (Baxterianism) which turned faith itself into a 'work' and presented it as the Ground of justification. Boston contended for unconditional grace to everyman without exception.

'The tear of repentance is shed by the eye of faith, and faith as it weeps stands before the cross'

By separating Christ from his benefits, Hadow and others had begun to fall into the categories of Arminianism and reduced the Gospel to a message about the benefits of Christ's death. Boston and his friends along with true orthodoxy preached not mere benefits but a saviour who is full of grace and able to save to the uttermost all those who come to God by him.'

The nature of Gospel Evangelism

Evangelism as carried on by preaching and pastoral admonition took time and was expected to take time. The Westminster tradition were realistic about the likelihood that the conversion process from start to finish would take months, just as the gestation and final birth of a human baby does. The main way in which God advances conversion in our day as in Boston's is through the sustained faithfulness of parents, friends and Church teachers witnessing, instructing and encouraging informally and of preachers expounding the Gospel.

There is a vital connection between the state of the ministry and the health of the Church.

We are reminded of the words of Richard Baxter ' All Churches either rise or fall as the ministry doth rise or fall (not in worldly grandeur) but in knowledge, zeal and ability for their work.'

'The great want of today is a holier ministry. We do not need more stalwart polemics, more mighty apologists, or preachers who compass a wide range of natural knowledge, important as these are; but men of God who bring the atmosphere of heaven with them into the pulpit and speak from the borders of another world’  Robert Sample writing in 1897.

The nature of God's work

'His great learning, his powerful gifts as a preacher and the force and sanctity of his character would have marked him out as eminently adapted for a higher sphere; but the days gad come when the other party manoeuvred to prevent the promotion of such ''high-flyers'' as the were called, and the result in this case was, to use his own expression, that he was ''staked in Ettrick'' 'Blaikie 196

It is not where a Christian serves but what quality of service he renders that really counts. Boston didn’t get his preferment in this life. He was not able to see fully the purpose behind his 'sea of troubles' in Ettrick. But while men who occupied prominent positions in the Church are largely forgotten the writings of Thomas Boston are read around the world today.

'Boston is a proof that the truths which penetrate deepest in the soul of man, which move it most powerfully, which transform it most thoroughly, and which are cherished most gratefully are those which form the warp and the woof of The Crook in the Lot and The Fourfold State.' Blaikie 197

8. The Difficulties he encountered

The Reformation in Scotland was more thorough and complete than anywhere outside Geneva itself. Established by law in 1560. Embraced Presbyterianism. Attempts to impose Episcopacy. Kirk resisted this in the National Covenant. The teaching of the Reformed Faith in the Westminster Confession and catechisms.

The Restoration of Charles II in 1660 undid all the good work of the Covenants and restored bishops. In 1662 Acts formally re-established episcopacy, outlawed the covenants, banned conventicles and re-introduced patronage. Some 270 of the best ministers in Scotland were deprived of their livings for refusing to accept the new establishment. This led to the Covenanter struggle and the killing times, which embittered the Presbyterians. .Indulgences in 1669 and 1672 were only moderately successful. Opposition was confined to the southwest where a small band that came to be called Camerionians renounced their allegiance to the king in the Sanguhair Declaration of 22 June 1680.

The Revolution of 1688 and in 1689 the Scottish crown was granted to William of Orange. On 7th June 1690 Presbyterian government was restored, the ejected ministers were reinstated. Parliamentary approval was given to the Westminster Confession of Faith. Patronage was conditionally abolished.  It was in many ways a compromise.

1)The right of nomination of ministers remained with heritors.

2) Many Episcopalians ministers were encouraged to remain in their parishes under the re-established Presbyterian system. They outnumbered the Presbyterians and their presence was to have a baneful effect on the Church.

The doctrinal and spiritual decline

James Fraser of Brea: 'I perceive that divinity was much altered from what it was in the primitive Reformers' time… I abhorred and was at enmity with Mr Baxter as a stated enemy to the grace of God, under the cover of opposing Antinomianism.'

Dr John Macleod: 'There was a way of putting things which dealt in a very gingerly fashion with the grace of the Gospel, and fenced its freedom with such restrictions and conditions as turned it into a new law and abridged the comfort and assurance of salvation that believers are warranted to cherish.'

It was only after 1714 that the extent of the drift became evident.

John Simson was Professor of Divinity at Glasgow in 1706. He taught students from West of Scotland and Ulster. In 1715 charged with propagating Arminianism. The General Assembly appointed a Committee to investigate the Charge. Its report was not given until the Assembly of 1717. He questionable modes of expression but did not intend to deviate from the Confession. He was acquitted with a warning 'not to attribute too much to natural reason and the power of corrupt nature to the disparagement of revelation and efficacious free grace'

At the next diet of the Assembly In the following diet was taken in a proposition calculated by the Presbytery of Auchterarder for opposing the erroneous doctrine of Professor Simson. In an effort to counteract the Arminian and Legalist teaching of the time they resolved to ask student for licence Do you subscribe to the following proposition 'It is not sound and orthodox to teach that we must first forsake sin in order to our coming to Christ and instating us in Covenant with God' A young student William Craig hesitated to give assent to it. The Presbytery refused to give him an extract of the licence. He appealed to Assembly and won. The Assembly declared it abhorrence of the Auchterarder creed.

That day proved to be a watershed in the history of the Church of Scotland. 'In the condemnation of that proposition was the beginning of the spate for several years after ran in the public actings of the Church against the doctrines of grace, under the name of Antinomianism'. It was in that assembly that Boston mentioned the book that was to be at the very centre of the dispute and gave the controversy its name The Marrow of Modern Divinity. The Marrow 1641 and 1648 Edward Fisher 12 years in a legalistic spirit approved by some of the Westminster divines a distillation of the best divines Luther Calvin etc

'Hence the more one pursues communion with God, he will more narrowly observe providence; and when he grows remiss and negligent as to communion with God he lets these things easily pass' I 197

'The timing of providence the great weight of a dispensation sometimes lies in this very circumstance, that then it came, and neither sooner or later.'

Thomas Boston was a man of God. Before his death 'young and old had come to pronounce his name with reverence. It has become a synonym for holy living'